EN
Back to the archive

The archive · Developer & Business Tools · Financial decision · 2020

HashiCorp raises $175M at $5.1B on the enterprise multi-cloud bet

Cloud-agnostic open-source infrastructure tools Terraform, Vault, Consul and Nomad drew a $175M Series E at a $5.1B valuation in March 2020.

HashiCorp

The betThat enterprises would standardize on its cloud-neutral stack (Terraform, Vault, Consul, Nomad) rather than one cloud's native tools, and pay for enterprise features.Scaling

What the business is

HashiCorp builds open-source infrastructure automation — Terraform for infrastructure as code, Vault for secrets management, Consul for service networking, Nomad for workload scheduling — and sells paid enterprise editions and SaaS (Terraform Enterprise/Cloud) to large organizations.

Starting capital$175M Series E at a $5.1B valuation, announced 2020-03-16 in a GlobeNewswire release framed around supporting multi-cloud transformation for global enterprises.

How it started

HashiCorp's tools became fixtures of DevOps before the company itself was widely known: HN commenters recalled Mitchell Hashimoto's Vagrant as the early hit and watched Terraform, Vault, Consul and Nomad spread through production environments. By March 2020, with enterprises running deliberate multi-cloud strategies, the company announced a $175M Series E at a $5.1B valuation to fund multi-cloud transformation for global enterprises.

What happened

Announced 2020-03-16 as COVID-19 roiled markets, the round drew one of HN's most divided threads: practitioners cited Fortune 100 banks going multi-cloud on purpose and seven-figure HashiCorp checks, while skeptics argued AWS-native CloudFormation and Secrets Manager, plus Kubernetes' momentum against Nomad, left the paid layer — and the $5.1B valuation — unjustified.

No ending yet — it is still running.

Background

HashiCorp sells infrastructure automation built on open-source tools — Terraform for infrastructure as code, Vault for secrets, Consul for service networking, Nomad for scheduling — with paid enterprise editions for large organizations. On 2020-03-16 it announced a $175M Series E at a $5.1B valuation, framed around supporting multi-cloud transformation for global enterprises.

The company had become a DevOps fixture first: commenters traced the run to Mitchell Hashimoto's Vagrant, with Terraform, Vault, Consul and Nomad spreading through production environments, and practitioners in the thread described large banks deliberately pursuing multi-cloud strategies and organizations writing seven-figure checks.

The HN front-page discussion (257 points, 86 comments) aired the bet's open question: would enterprises pay HashiCorp for a cloud-neutral layer, or would native cloud services and Kubernetes keep eroding the paid products? The source material ends at the raise, with no later results to settle it.

What has to be true

  • Practitioners described the demand as real: a Fortune 100 banker said his bank is deliberately going multi-cloud, and commenters knew of organizations writing seven-figure checks to HashiCorp.
  • Open source built the funnel: engineers adopted Terraform and Vault free, then enterprises paid for governance features — SAML/SSO, audit logs, on-prem installs — that the free tools lacked.
  • The skeptical case was equally concrete: AWS-native CloudFormation and Secrets Manager plus Kubernetes' momentum against Nomad threatened the paid layer, leaving monetization the open question.
  • Raising $175M just as markets crashed looked counter-cyclical, and commenters wondered whether the deal predated the selloff and whether that much capital made sense for an infrastructure company.

What can be applied

Developer-loved open source gets a company into the enterprise, but its ceiling depends on whether paid features beat the clouds' native tools — a question even a $5.1B round leaves open.

Aftermath

As of 2020-03-17 HashiCorp had just announced the Series E to expand its enterprise multi-cloud business; the source material contains no later revenue, product or liquidity outcome, so the case stops at the raise and the public debate around it.

Sources

spotted an error? The archive wants to know.

Your turn

You just read one. Describe what you are building, and see who is betting on the same thing.

Free account · 3 free questions · no card

Related cases