档案库 · 消费应用 · 财务决策 · 2016
Spotify 借贷 10 亿美元,利率随期限递增,而非进行降价融资,以对抗 Apple Music
2016 年 3 月,Spotify 通过可转换债务融资 10 亿美元,以对抗 Apple Music,押注增长优先于保护其 85 亿美元的估值。
Spotify
做的是什么生意
Spotify runs an on-demand music streaming service with free and paid tiers; in early 2016 it was a private company valued at $8.5B, racing Apple Music for subscribers worldwide.
启动资金:$1B in convertible debt from TPG, Dragoneer and clients of Goldman Sachs, on top of roughly €570M in cash a source said Spotify still held; its last valuation, $8.5B, was set in June 2015.
起因
By March 2016 Spotify was in a race it believed it could not afford to lose: on-demand streaming was becoming how people consume music, and whoever signed up subscribers fastest would keep their data and network effects for a long time. Its rival Apple, which the article calls the most well-funded company in history, was spending on consumer education, artist exclusives and Apple Music, and Spotify judged it needed comparable fuel.
经过
On 2016-03-29 Spotify confirmed it had raised $1B in convertible debt from TPG, Dragoneer and clients of Goldman Sachs. The terms were aggressive: lenders convert at a 20% discount to the eventual IPO price, the discount grows 2.5% every six months after a year without an IPO, interest starts at 5% and steps up 1% every six months toward a 10% cap, and TPG and Dragoneer can sell 90 days after listing, before employees' 180-day lockup ends. A source familiar with Spotify's finances said the company still held about €570M in the bank, so the raise was for offense: growth, marketing and possible acquisitions such as SoundCloud or Pandora, not survival.
还没有结局,它还在跑。
背景
2016 年 3 月 29 日,Spotify 确认从 TPG、Dragoneer 和高盛客户处筹集 10 亿美元可转换债务,该交易由《华尔街日报》首次报道,资金将用于增长和营销。公司选择债务而非股权,因为以低于 2015 年 6 月设定的 85 亿美元估值的股权融资,会释放降价信号,并让对手 Apple 获得公关胜利。
条款苛刻:TPG 和 Dragoneer 可按最终 IPO 价格的 20% 折扣转换,一年无 IPO 后折扣每六个月上升 2.5%,利率从 5% 起步,每六个月攀升 1% 至 10% 上限,贷款人可在上市后 90 天出售股票,而员工需等待 180 天。消息人士称,Spotify 仍有约 5.7 亿欧元银行存款,因此资金用于进攻:广告教育消费者流媒体、独家艺人协议,以及可能收购 SoundCloud 或 Pandora。
理由在于规模:按需流媒体是大势所趋,谁最快获得订阅用户,就能多年利用数据与网络效应。与 Apple 竞争(TechCrunch 称之为史上资金最雄厚的公司)意味着需要匹配其烧钱能力,Spotify 判断输掉比赛的风险大于债务风险。该交易当天在 Hacker News 获得 292 分和 226 条评论,评论者争论条款是否实际上迫使 Spotify 快速 IPO。
这件事要成立,得有什么
- 按需流媒体看起来是赢家通吃的比赛:谁最快获得订阅用户,谁就能长期保有数据与网络效应,延迟比债务惩罚更昂贵。
- 债务避免了降价融资信号:以低于 2015 年 6 月 85 亿美元估值的股权融资,会在 Spotify 需要展现强势的关头,向客户、艺人和 Apple 暴露弱点。
- 资金用于进攻而非求生:拥有约 5.7 亿欧元银行存款,融资用于营销、艺人独占和潜在收购(如 SoundCloud 或 Pandora)。
- Apple 是史上资金最雄厚的公司,因此 Spotify 认为需要同等的火力,即使条款带有高利贷式的递增惩罚。
可借鉴之处
在定义品类的竞争中,如果输掉代价更高,创始人会接受苛刻条款:Spotify 选择利率随 IPO 延迟递增的债务,因为降价融资显示弱势,而延迟会增加折扣。
后续进展
截至 2016 年 3 月 29 日,Spotify 仍存活且为私人持有,10 亿美元可转换融资刚刚公布。TPG 表示,融资为 Spotify 提供了战略资源以加强领导地位,熟悉其财务的消息人士称其持有约 5.7 亿欧元现金,因此资金用于增长、营销和收购而非求生。该交易给 Spotify 一年时间上市,之后贷款人 20% 的转换折扣将每六个月增加 2.5%;HN 讨论串争论条款是否迫使 Spotify 进行原本可能推迟的 IPO。
资料来源
- Spotify raises $1 billion in debt with devilish terms to fight Apple Music
- HN discussion: Spotify raises $1B in debt with devilish terms to fight Apple Music
发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。
轮到你了
你刚读完一家。说说你在做什么,看看谁在赌同一件事。
免费账号 · 3 次免费提问 · 不用绑卡