档案库 · 消费应用 · 财务决策 · 2010–2019
WeWork上市豪赌破裂:470亿美元私募估值滑向100亿美元IPO
软银将WeWork估值推至近470亿美元;S-1文件提交数周后,路透社称其IPO估值可能低至100亿美元。
WeWork
做的是什么生意
A flexible-office lessor: WeWork signs long-term leases on buildings and sublets desks, offices and meeting rooms to companies on flexible short-term memberships, dressing a real-estate business in technology and community branding.
启动资金:About $12.8B raised across rounds per Crunchbase data cited in the thread, including roughly $8–9B from SoftBank's Vision Fund; the last private round valued WeWork near $47B.
起因
WeWork began around 2010 — its own S-1 says 'Nine years ago, we had a mission to create a world where people work to make a life, not just a living' — and grew into a 'community company' whose stated mission was to 'elevate the world's consciousness.' It signed long-term leases and sublet flexible space, reached roughly 833 locations and close to 300,000 members by 2019, and raised about $12.8B, much of it from SoftBank's Vision Fund.
经过
After the S-1 became public in August 2019, scrutiny was immediate: Bloomberg reported that WeWork had lent founder Adam Neumann money as it paid him rent on properties he owned (four of its 833 locations), his dual role as landlord and CEO drew press attention, and the prospectus's 'community company' language became a punchline. Commenters calculated WeWork lost about $0.50 for every $1 of revenue, compared it with Regus/IWG — similar square footage, profitable, worth roughly $4.5–9.8B — and Aswath Damodaran publicly estimated the equity at about $13.75B ($26/share) against lease-and-debt obligations of ~$23.8B. IPO talk fell from initial reports near $65B, or the $47B actual round, to $20–30B, and then to a possible $10B.
结果
By 2019-09-13 the bet was visibly breaking: sources told Reuters WeWork was considering an IPO valuation as low as $10B — roughly an 80% cut from the $47B private round — and the thread's consensus was that WeWork needed the IPO's cash (about $3B raised to unlock $6B of credit) but could not get it at the price its investors had set.
背景
WeWork约于2010年成立,定位“社区公司”——S-1的使命是“提升全球意识”——但其实质是房地产业务:签物业长期租约,向企业和个人转租灵活的全托管空间。到2019年,运营约833个门店,会员近30万,融资约128亿美元,其中大量来自软银愿景基金,后者最后一轮将公司估值定在近470亿美元。
2019年IPO背后的赌注是公开投资者会接受租赁业务的科技型估值:报道最初浮出650亿美元,公司还称需要约30亿美元的募资以解锁60亿美元的信贷。S-1在数周内戳破故事——创始人亚当·诺伊曼曾被公司借款,公司还向他拥有的物业付租,每1美元收入亏损约0.50美元。评论者将WeWork与雷格斯/IWG比较——后者拥有类似面积却盈利,价格仅是零头——达摩达兰估其股权价值约137.5亿美元。
2019年9月13日,路透社报道WeWork正考虑低至100亿美元的IPO估值,数周内较上轮私募缩水约80%。该事件当天在Hacker News上获得190点积分和219条评论,评论分为两派:一派认为100亿美元仍高估了一个亏损转租商,另一派则质疑软银470亿美元的定价从一开始是否有意义。
这件事要成立,得有什么
- S-1迫使外界重新审视该公司:“社区公司”招股书对应的是每1美元收入亏0.50美元的生意,创始人借款和房东冲突摧毁信任。
- 估值由单一买家软银设定在约470亿美元;公开可比公司表明出租商经济性——雷格斯/IWG以约45至98亿美元企业价值运营类似面积且盈利。
- WeWork对IPO的需求大于投资者:约30亿美元融资与约60亿美元信贷挂钩,因此价格发现不利时不能抽身走人。
- 房地产成本不像软件行为:租约和装修成本使每个新增会员的代价高昂,增长无法支撑科技倍数。
可借鉴之处
单一投资者设定的价格并非市场价值:当急需资金的出租商遇上公开买家,其经济模型数周内即被重新定价——470亿到100亿美元即是市场对其业务的裁决。
后续进展
截至2019年9月13日,WeWork尚未定价IPO;消息人士对路透社表示,公司正在考虑低至100亿美元的估值,讨论则认为上市取决于软银和WeWork是否愿意接受较上轮私募折价约80%的条款。该素材未记录此后任何日期的事件,因此WeWork是否撤回、更换领导层或最终上市均不在本案范围内。
资料来源
- WeWork considers IPO valuation of as low as $10B
- Exclusive: WeWork considers IPO valuation of as low as $10 billion: sources
- WeWork Gave Founder Loans as It Paid Him Rent, IPO Filing Shows
- WeWork S-1 registration statement
发现哪里写错了?告诉我们。
轮到你了
你刚读完一家。说说你在做什么,看看谁在赌同一件事。
免费账号 · 3 次免费提问 · 不用绑卡